MITROFLOW LONG TERM RESULTS
The Italian study on the Mitroflow postoperative results (ISTHMUS):
a 20-year, multicentre evaluation of Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis
The ISTHMUS Investigators - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 39 (2011) 18-26
|
Number of patients
|
1591
|
|
Implant time frame
|
Nov 1988 - June 2008
|
|
Mean Age (yrs)
|
75.3 ± 6.8
|
|
Total patient ears
|
7.447
|
|
Mean Follow up (yrs)
|
61.9 months
|
“Our echocardio-graphic findings at discharge and at follow-up, obtained at rest, were consistent with satisfactory haemodynamic properties of the Mitroflow pericardial valve, particularly in small sizes, and confirmed excellent and constant haemodynamic performances in the majority of the patients also at long term, in accordance to the findings of Yankah and colleagues”
CLINICAL RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS
“This study indicates that the Mitroflow pericardial valve provides favourable postoperative results at long term in terms of valve durability, valve-related events and patient clinical conditions. Furthermore, good haemodynamic performance can be expected postoperatively, even in the presence of small prosthetic sizes, therefore representing, in our opinion, an extremely valuable bioprosthesis in case of planned aortic valve replacement with a tissue valve, particularly for patients older than 70 years or in the presence of a small aortic annulus.”
Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Durability results up to 21 years
C.A. Yankah, M. Pasic, M. Musci, J. Stein, C. Detschades, H. Siniawski, and R. Hetzer - J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;136(3):688-96
|
N° of patients |
1513 |
|
Implant time frame |
March 1986 - Apr 2007 |
|
Mean Age (yrs) |
73.2 ± 0.22 yrs |
|
Average Follow up |
4.07 ± 0.12 yrs |
|
Total patient years |
6163.5 |
HEMODYNAMIC RESULTS

CLINICAL RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS
“The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis exhibits very low pressure gradients combined with easy implantability. After two decades of follow-up, the Mitroflow pericardial aortic valve continues to be a valve of choice with a predictable low rate of valve-related events, particularly for patients over the age of 65 -70 and others with comorbidities.”